10-K: ECA Marcellus Trust I Reports Higher 2025 Distributable Income
Annual Report
ECA Marcellus Trust I's 2025 annual report shows a significant increase in distributable income driven by higher natural gas prices, despite a decline in production volumes.
Summary
- ECA Marcellus Trust I is a statutory trust that passively holds royalty interests in 14 Producing Wells and 40 PUD Wells (52.06 Equivalent PUD Wells) in Greene County, Pennsylvania.
- The Trust's primary purpose is to hold these Royalty Interests, distribute cash to unitholders after expenses, and perform administrative functions; it does not conduct any operational activities.
- Greylock Energy, LLC, through its subsidiaries, serves as the operator of the subject wells and assumed all of Legacy ECA's obligations to the Trust in November 2017.
- Legacy ECA fulfilled its drilling obligation for the PUD Wells by November 30, 2011, meaning no additional wells will be drilled for the Trust.
- The Trust's distributable income for the year ended December 31, 2025, increased significantly to $2.2 million, up from $0.8 million in 2024.
- Royalty income rose by $1.6 million to $3.8 million in 2025, primarily due to a substantial increase in the average realized natural gas price to $2.18 per Mcf in 2025 from $1.11 per Mcf in 2024.
- The weighted average monthly closing NYMEX price increased to $3.43 per MMBtu in 2025, compared to $2.27 per MMBtu in 2024.
- Natural gas production volumes decreased by 12.2% from 1,964 MMcf in 2024 to 1,724 MMcf in 2025.
- General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1 million to $1.18 million in 2025.
- The Trustee is continuing to build a cash reserve, withholding $0.4 million in 2025 and $0.2 million in 2024, towards a targeted amount of approximately $3.8 million (with $2.7 million plus $0.3 million interest accumulated as of December 31, 2025).
- Total proved natural gas reserves attributable to the Royalty Interests were estimated at 14.9 Bcf as of December 31, 2025.
- The Trust is expected to begin liquidation on or about March 31, 2030, unless an early termination event occurs, such as gross proceeds falling below $1.5 million over four consecutive quarters (current gross proceeds for the four quarters ended December 31, 2025, were $3.8 million).
Sentiment
Score: 7
Explanation: StockSavvy.ai views this as a moderately positive report, primarily driven by a significant rebound in natural gas prices which boosted distributable income. However, the Trust's passive, depleting asset nature and exposure to commodity price volatility and regulatory changes temper the overall sentiment.
Positives
- Distributable income increased significantly to $2.2 million in 2025 from $0.8 million in 2024, representing a 175% increase.
- Royalty income increased by $1.6 million to $3.8 million in 2025, reflecting improved market conditions.
- The average realized natural gas price increased substantially by $1.07 per Mcf to $2.18 per Mcf in 2025.
- The weighted average monthly closing NYMEX price rose to $3.43 per MMBtu in 2025 from $2.27 per MMBtu in 2024.
- General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1 million to $1.18 million in 2025, indicating cost management.
- Gross proceeds over the four consecutive quarters ended December 31, 2025, were $3.8 million, well above the $1.5 million threshold for early Trust termination.
- A settlement with FERC regarding Columbia Gas Transmission tariff rates resulted in a reduction to $0.4376 per MMBtu from April 1, 2025, and refunds for prior overcharges will be distributed to the Trust in Q1 2026.
Negatives
- Natural gas production decreased by 12.2% from 1,964 MMcf in 2024 to 1,724 MMcf in 2025, indicating a decline in underlying asset performance.
- Average post-production costs increased to $0.69 per Mcf in 2025 from $0.63 per Mcf in 2024, primarily due to higher firm transportation charges.
- The Trust's assets are depleting, and there are no future well locations or drilling opportunities to replace declining production.
- The Trust is passive and has no control over the operational decisions, sales, or development of the underlying natural gas properties.
- The Trust has no hedging arrangements in place, leaving it fully exposed to the significant price volatility inherent in natural gas commodities.
- The Trustee is withholding funds for a cash reserve, which reduces the immediate cash available for distribution to unitholders.
- The Trust's financial statements are prepared on a modified cash basis, not GAAP, which may make them less comparable or attractive to some investors.
- As a smaller reporting company, the Trust benefits from reduced governance and disclosure requirements, including no auditor attestation for internal control over financial reporting, which could be a concern for investors.
- Uncertainty under Pennsylvania law regarding the treatment of Royalty Interests as real property interests could lead to them being treated as unsecured claims in the event of Greylock Production's bankruptcy.
Risks
- Natural gas prices fluctuate due to factors beyond the Trust's and Greylock Production's control, and lower prices would reduce proceeds to the Trust and cash distributions to Trust unitholders.
- Actual reserves and future production may be less than current estimates, which could reduce cash distributions by the Trust and the value of the Trust units.
- Any limitation in the availability of gathering, transportation, and processing facilities could interfere with sales of natural gas production from the Underlying Properties.
- Adverse developments in the Trust's existing area of operation (Marcellus Shale in Greene County, Pennsylvania) could adversely impact its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows due to lack of diversification.
- Natural gas wells are subject to operational hazards (e.g., fires, leaks, explosions, equipment failures, natural disasters) that can cause substantial losses, potentially exceeding Greylock Production's insurance coverage.
- Declines in the financial position or creditworthiness of Greylock Production or any third-party operators could impede the operation of wells and their ability to satisfy obligations to the Trust.
- The Trust units may lose value as a result of title deficiencies with respect to the Underlying Properties.
- The natural gas reserves attributable to the Underlying Properties are depleting assets, and the Trust is precluded from acquiring other oil and gas properties or Royalty Interests to replace them.
- The amount of cash available for distribution by the Trust will be reduced by post-production costs, applicable taxes associated with the Trust's interest, and Trust expenses.
- The Trust has established a cash reserve for contingent liabilities and to pay expenses, which reduces current distributions to Trust unitholders.
- An increase in the negative basis differential between the price realized by Greylock Production for natural gas and the NYMEX or other benchmark price could reduce proceeds and distributions.
- The Trust has no hedges in place to protect against the price risk inherent in holding interests in natural gas.
- The Trust is passive and has no stockholder voting rights in Greylock Production, managerial, contractual, or other ability to influence Greylock Production, or control over field operations.
- Greylock Production may sell all or a portion of the Underlying Properties, and a purchaser could have a weaker financial position and/or be less experienced.
- The Trustee may, under certain circumstances (e.g., gross proceeds below $1.5 million for four consecutive quarters), sell the Royalty Interests and dissolve the Trust.
- Unless sooner terminated, the Trust will begin to terminate following the end of the 20-year period in which the Trust owns the Term Royalty Interests (March 31, 2030).
- Conflicts of interest could arise between Greylock Production and the Trust unitholders.
- The Trust is administered by a Trustee who cannot be replaced except at a special meeting of Trust unitholders with a majority vote.
- Financial information of the Trust is not prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may make the Trust Units less attractive to investors.
- As a smaller reporting company, the Trust benefits from certain reduced governance and disclosure requirements, which could make the Trust Units less attractive to investors.
- Trust unitholders have limited ability to enforce provisions of the Royalty Interests, and Greylock Production's liability to the Trust is limited.
- Because the Trust units are traded on the OTCID Basic Market, Trust unitholders may have more difficulty selling Trust units or obtaining accurate quotations.
- Private Investors may sell additional Trust units, which could adversely affect the trading price of the Trust units.
- Courts outside of Delaware may not recognize the limited liability of Trust unitholders provided under Delaware law.
- Greylock Production is subject to complex federal, state, local, and other laws and regulations, including environmental laws, that could adversely affect the cost, manner, or feasibility of conducting its operations or expose Greylock Production to significant liabilities.
- Climate change laws and regulations restricting emissions of 'greenhouse gases' could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for natural gas, while physical effects of climate change could disrupt production.
- Cyber-attacks or other failures in telecommunications or information technology systems could result in information theft, data corruption, and significant disruption of Greylock Energy's or the Trustee's business operations.
- The Trust's tax treatment depends on its status as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes; if the IRS were to treat it as a corporation, cash available for distribution would be substantially reduced.
- If the Trust were subjected to a material amount of additional entity-level taxation by Pennsylvania or any other states, the Trust's cash available for distribution would be reduced.
- If enacted, severance taxes in Pennsylvania could materially increase the applicable taxes borne by the Trust.
- The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in the Trust units could be affected by recent and potential legislative, judicial, or administrative changes and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
- The Trust prorates items of income, gain, loss, and deduction between transferors and transferees of Trust units each month based on ownership on the first day of each month, which may be challenged by the IRS.
- If the IRS contests the United States federal income tax positions the Trust takes, the market for the Trust units may be adversely impacted, and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce distributable cash.
- Each Trust unitholder is required to pay taxes on their share of the Trust's income even if they do not receive any cash distributions.
- Tax gain or loss on the disposition of Trust units could be more or less than expected, with a substantial portion potentially taxed as ordinary income due to recapture items.
- Tax-exempt organizations and non-United States persons face unique tax issues from owning Trust units that may result in adverse tax consequences.
- The IRS may challenge the Trust's treatment of each purchaser of Trust units as having the same economic attributes without regard to the actual Trust units purchased.
- A Trust unitholder whose Trust units are loaned to a short seller may be considered as having disposed of those Trust units for tax purposes, potentially recognizing gain or loss and losing partner status.
- The Trust may adopt certain valuation methodologies that may affect the income, gain, loss, and deduction allocable to Trust unitholders, which the IRS may challenge.
- Certain United States federal income tax preferences currently available with respect to natural gas production may be eliminated as a result of future legislation.
Future Outlook
The Trust is expected to remain in existence until its Termination Date on or about March 31, 2030, at which point it will begin to liquidate, with Term Royalty Interests reverting to Greylock Production and Perpetual Royalty Interests being sold. The Trustee plans to continue withholding $90,000 per quarter to reach a targeted cash reserve of approximately $3.8 million. Future gross proceeds are subject to natural gas price volatility and could fall below the $1.5 million early termination threshold. Regulatory changes, particularly concerning environmental laws (e.g., WOTUS definition, methane emissions, Waste Emissions Charge), are uncertain due to ongoing litigation and potential legislative actions, which could impact operating costs and demand for natural gas. The tariff rate for Columbia Gas Transmission is set to increase annually through March 31, 2028.
Management Comments
- The Trustee has no authority or responsibility for, and no involvement with, any aspect of the oil and gas operations on the properties to which the Royalty Interests relate.
- The Trust assumes no obligation, and disclaims any duty, to update these forward-looking statements.
- Greylock Production believes that it is in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations and that continued compliance with current requirements would not have a material adverse effect on Greylock Production's capital expenditures, results of operations or financial position.
- Greylock Production currently does not expect that air pollution control requirements will have a material adverse effect on its operations.
- Greylock Production believes that its continued compliance with existing state regulations will not have a material adverse effect on the cash distributions to the Trust unitholders.
- Although the events in Ukraine and the Middle East are not currently expected to have a material impact on the Trust's business, cash flows, liquidity or financial condition, neither Greylock Energy nor the Trustee can predict the progress or outcome of the wars in Ukraine or in the Persian Gulf, as these conflicts, and any resulting government reactions, are evolving and beyond the control of Greylock Energy or the Trust.
- Sarah Newell, Vice President and Trust Officer, certified that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Trust are effective as of December 31, 2025.
Industry Context
StockSavvy.ai notes that the natural gas industry is highly competitive and inherently volatile, with prices significantly influenced by global supply and demand dynamics, geopolitical tensions (such as the ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Persian Gulf), and broader economic conditions like inflation. The Trust's exclusive focus on the Marcellus Shale in Greene County, Pennsylvania, makes it particularly susceptible to regional operational and regulatory risks. The broader energy sector is navigating an evolving regulatory landscape, with federal efforts under the Trump Administration to roll back certain environmental regulations (e.g., GHG endangerment finding, WEC rules) creating uncertainty, while state-level initiatives and ongoing litigation continue to shape compliance costs and operational feasibility for natural gas producers. Cybersecurity threats are also an increasing concern across the energy infrastructure.
Comparison to Industry Standards
- The average decline rate for the 40 PUD Wells (approximately 40.9% during the first year of production, 18.6% during the next three to five years, and 6.5% per year thereafter) was noted as generally consistent with other development wells in the Area of Mutual Interest (AMI) as originally projected, though actual rates were higher than initial estimates.
- Post-production costs for the Trust's natural gas averaged $0.67 per MMBtu in 2025 and $0.61 per MMBtu in 2024; Greylock Production is permitted to increase its Post-Production Services Fee to recover capital expenditures on the Greene County Gathering System (GCGS), provided the resulting charge does not exceed prevailing charges in the area for similar services, implying a benchmark against local industry rates.
- The firm transportation tariff rate with Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC was settled at $0.4376 per MMBtu from April 1, 2025, increasing by $0.0075 per MMBtu annually through March 31, 2028, which is a specific cost but not directly compared to other pipeline operators or industry benchmarks in the filing.
Management Changes
| Role | Previous Person | New Person | Effective Date | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Information Officer and Global Head of Engineering (BNY Mellon) | Not specified | Joined BNY Mellon in 2024 | 2024 | Refreshing leadership to bring new perspectives and specialized expertise. |
| Chief Information Security Officer (BNY Mellon) | Not specified | Joined BNY Mellon in 2025 | 2025 | Refreshing leadership to bring new perspectives and specialized expertise. |
| Chief Technology Risk Officer (BNY Mellon) | Not specified | Joined BNY Mellon in 2024 | 2024 | Refreshing leadership to bring new perspectives and specialized expertise. |
Corporate Governance
| Change Type | Description | Effective Date | Impact Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | The Trust does not have a board of directors, an audit committee, an audit committee financial expert, or a nominating committee, as it is administered by a corporate Trustee. | N/A | Limits unitholder oversight and direct influence over governance compared to traditional corporations; relies on the Trustee's internal governance structures. |
| Policies | The Trust has not adopted a code of ethics or insider trading policy applicable to principal executive/financial officers, as it has none. Employees of the Trustee must comply with the Trustee's (BNY Mellon) code of ethics and insider trading policies. | N/A | Ensures ethical conduct and compliance through the Trustee's established corporate policies, but specific Trust-level policies are absent due to its passive nature. |
| Disclosure Requirements | The Trust is a smaller reporting company, benefiting from reduced governance and disclosure requirements, including no auditor attestation to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. | N/A | May make the Trust Units less attractive to some investors due to less comprehensive disclosures and lack of auditor attestation on internal controls, potentially increasing perceived risk. |
Legal Proceedings
- Legacy ECA received a Notice of Violation (NOV) from PADEP in December 2015 related to water impoundments, resulting in a $1.7 million Civil Penalty Settlement and remediation agreement, which did not affect Trust distributions.
- Greylock Production and other parties protested Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC's proposed tariff rate increase at FERC, leading to a settlement approved on October 30, 2025, which included refunds for prior overcharges.
- Ongoing litigation is expected to challenge the legality of the revised definition of 'waters of the United States' (WOTUS) and USACE Nationwide Permits, creating regulatory uncertainty.
- The SEC's 2024 climate disclosure rule was challenged in court, and the SEC announced in March 2025 that it had voted to end its defense of the rule, indicating potential changes to future climate-related disclosure requirements.
Related Party Transactions
- The Trust pays Greylock Production an annual administrative services fee of $60,000 for accounting, bookkeeping, and informational services.
- The Trust pays an annual administrative fee to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, which was $180,876 in 2025 and $175,607 in 2024.
- The Trust pays an annual administrative fee of $2,500 to Wilmington Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee.
- Greylock Production has a right of first refusal to purchase the Perpetual Royalty Interests upon termination of the Trust.
- Greylock Production may, without Trust unitholder consent, require the Trust to release Royalty Interests with an aggregate value up to $5.0 million during any twelve-month period, provided the Trust receives fair value.
- Greylock Production is permitted to increase its Post-Production Services Fee for costs on the Greene County Gathering System (GCGS) to recover certain capital expenditures, provided the charge does not exceed prevailing charges in the area for similar services.
- Greylock Production can enter into new processing and transportation contracts without independent bids, deducting charges from Trust proceeds; however, affiliate contracts must be comparable to prevailing charges for similar services.
Stakeholder Impact
- Shareholders (Unitholders): Experience increased distributable income due to higher natural gas prices, but face reduced immediate distributions due to cash reserve withholdings. Long-term value is impacted by the depleting nature of assets and lack of new drilling. Exposed to commodity price volatility, potential tax changes, and limited influence over Trust operations.
- Greylock Production: Benefits from higher natural gas prices and receives administrative fees from the Trust. Continues to operate the underlying wells and has a right of first refusal on Perpetual Royalty Interests. Faces operational, environmental, and regulatory compliance costs and risks.
- Regulatory Authorities: Involved in ongoing oversight of natural gas transportation rates (FERC) and environmental compliance (EPA, PADEP), with potential for new regulations or enforcement actions impacting Greylock Production's operations and costs.
Next Steps
- Greylock Production will distribute the portion of the Columbia Gas Transmission refund attributable to the Trust, along with the proceeds attributable to the fourth quarter of 2025, during the first quarter of 2026.
- The Trustee plans to continue withholding $90,000 per quarter until a total of approximately $3.8 million in cash reserves is accumulated.
- The new WOTUS definition is expected to go into effect in early 2026, potentially reducing CWA jurisdiction and permitting requirements.
- Litigation challenging the new WOTUS definition and USACE Nationwide Permits is likely, which could delay or preclude implementation of new rules.
- The EPA's reconsideration of 2024 rules for volatile organic compound and methane emissions, and the repeal of the GHG endangerment finding, may lead to further changes in air quality regulations.
- The U.S. Congress may consider amendment or repeal of certain portions of the Inflation Reduction Act, including the statutory provisions establishing the Waste Emissions Charge.
- The tariff rate for Columbia Gas Transmission will increase by $0.0075 per MMBtu annually through March 31, 2028.
- The Trust will begin to liquidate on or about March 31, 2030, with Perpetual Royalty Interests to be sold thereafter.
Key Dates
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| March 2010 | ECA Marcellus Trust I was formed. |
| April 1, 2010 | Effective date of the Trust and commencement of the PDP Royalty Interest. |
| July 1, 2010 | Prospectus dated and filed with the SEC, relating to the initial public offering of the Trust units. |
| July 7, 2010 | PDP Royalty Interest was conveyed to the Trust; Administrative Services Agreement and Royalty Interest Lien were dated. |
| August 1, 2011 | Transportation Agreement with Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC became effective. |
| November 30, 2011 | Legacy ECA fulfilled its drilling obligation to the Trust for PUD Wells. |
| March 2014 | The last of the Trust's hedge arrangements expired. |
| March 31, 2014 | Original deadline for Legacy ECA to drill all PUD Wells. |
| 2014 | Prices received for natural gas production from Trust properties began to be lower than relevant benchmark prices. |
| December 24, 2015 | Legacy ECA received a Notice of Violation (NOV) from PADEP. |
| January 1, 2016 | Pennsylvania franchise tax rate of 0.045% was completely phased out. |
| June 2016 | The EPA issued a final rule implementing wastewater pretreatment standards. |
| November 2017 | Greylock Energy acquired substantially all of Legacy ECA's gas production and midstream assets, assuming Trust obligations. |
| First quarter of 2019 | The Trustee began gradually building a cash reserve for future expenses and liabilities. |
| March 2019 | Legacy ECA sold title ownership and working interest in the Penneco Morrow #1MH and #2MH wells to Greylock Production. |
| July 31, 2020 | Trust units began trading on the OTC Pink Market. |
| December 1, 2021 | Tariff rates under the Transportation Agreement were set pursuant to a FERC settlement. |
| November 2021 | The Trustee notified the Sponsor of an increase in the targeted cash reserve from $1.8 million to $3.8 million. |
| February 2022 | Outbreak of war between Russia and Ukraine, creating market uncertainties. |
| December 31, 2022 | The initial target of $1.8 million cash reserve was achieved. |
| 2023 | The Supreme Court issued the Sackett v. EPA decision, interpreting 'waters of the United States' (WOTUS) more narrowly. |
| Third quarter of 2024 | Greylock Production and Columbia amended the Transportation Agreement to reduce the firm transportation amount. |
| September 30, 2024 | Columbia submitted an application to FERC to increase certain tariff rates. |
| October 31, 2024 | FERC issued an Order Accepting and Suspending Columbia's filing, Subject to Refund. |
| November 2024 | The EPA adopted new rules to implement the Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) program. |
| December 31, 2024 | End of fiscal year. |
| January 1, 2025 | Reduced firm transportation amount of 39,901 MMBtu per day became effective through December 31, 2027. |
| January 20, 2025 | President Trump announced the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement. |
| February 2025 | The USACE began implementing emergency permitting procedures as directed by President Trump's Executive Order. |
| March 2025 | The EPA announced reconsideration of the 2024 rules for volatile organic compound and methane emissions standards. |
| March 2025 | President Trump signed legislation repealing the EPA's 2024 WEC rules under the Congressional Review Act. |
| March 2025 | The SEC announced it had voted to end its defense of the 2024 climate disclosure rule. |
| April 1, 2025 | Columbia began charging increased transportation rates (approximately $0.725 per MMBtu); later, a settlement rate of $0.4376 per MMBtu became effective. |
| June 1, 2025 | Columbia moved to place the Period I Settlement Rates into effect. |
| July 1, 2025 | Trust units began trading on the OTCID Basic Market; Columbia's motion for Period I Settlement Rates was granted. |
| July 2025 | The EPA issued a proposed rule to rescind the 2009 GHG endangerment finding. |
| August 13, 2025 | Columbia filed a proposed final settlement at FERC. |
| September 2025 | The EPA proposed to rescind the GHG reporting program for sectors other than oil and gas, and suspend for oil and gas until 2034. |
| September 15, 2025 | The Presiding Administrative Law Judge certified Columbia's settlement as uncontested. |
| October 30, 2025 | FERC approved Columbia's settlement, setting a tariff rate of $0.4376 per MMBtu from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. |
| November 2025 | The Army Corps of Engineers released a proposed rule revising the regulatory definition of WOTUS. |
| December 19, 2025 | Ryder Scott Company, L.P. reserve report was dated. |
| December 31, 2025 | End of fiscal year. |
| First quarter of 2026 | Greylock Production will distribute the portion of the refund attributable to the Trust, along with Q4 2025 proceeds. |
| Early 2026 | The new WOTUS definition is expected to go into effect without substantial changes from the proposed definition. |
| February 2026 | The EPA adopted a final rule repealing its prior GHG endangerment finding. |
| March 2026 | USACE Nationwide Permits (NWPs) will expire and be replaced with new versions. |
| March 24, 2026 | Filing date of the 10-K report. |
| March 31, 2028 | Columbia Gas Transmission tariff rate will increase by $0.0075 per MMBtu annually through this date. |
| 2029 | Expected compliance dates for existing sources under EPA's methane emissions guidelines. |
| March 31, 2030 | The Trust's Termination Date, when it will begin to liquidate. |
| 2034 | Proposed suspension of GHG reporting requirements for the oil and gas sector until this year. |
Recommendation
holdThe Trust experienced a strong rebound in distributable income and royalty income in 2025 due to favorable natural gas prices, which is a positive for current unitholders. However, the Trust is a passive, depleting asset with no new drilling opportunities, indicating a finite life and inevitable decline in production. While current commodity prices are beneficial, the Trust remains highly exposed to price volatility without hedging. The ongoing cash reserve build-up also reduces immediate distributions. Given the short-term positive financial performance driven by external market factors, balanced against the long-term structural limitations and inherent risks of a depleting asset, a 'Hold' recommendation is appropriate for investors who understand the Trust's passive nature and finite lifespan.
Keywords
ECA Marcellus Trust I, natural gas, royalty interests, Marcellus Shale, Greene County Pennsylvania, energy, oil and gas, production, reserves, distributable income, Greylock Energy, SEC filing, 10-K, financial report, commodity prices, post-production costs, trust units, energy sector, upstream
Disclaimer:The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, recommendation, or endorsement of any kind. It may contain errors or omissions. You should not rely on this information to make financial decisions. Always seek the advice of a qualified financial professional before making any investment or financial decisions. Use of this information is at your own risk.