8-K: Chrome Holding Co. Files Chapter 11 Liquidation Plan
Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement
Chrome Holding Co. and its subsidiaries filed a joint Chapter 11 plan to wind down operations and distribute assets, following the sale of most assets for $302.5 million and ongoing data breach settlements.
Summary
- Chrome Holding Co. (formerly 23andMe Holding Co.) and its subsidiaries (Debtors) filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions on March 23, 2025, to stabilize their business and sell assets.
- The Debtors sold substantially all of their assets to TTAM Research Institute for a total purchase price of $302.5 million in cash on July 14, 2025.
- The proposed plan includes the sale of the Debtors' Lemonaid telehealth business for $2.5 million, subject to higher and better offers.
- The plan aims to wind down the Debtors' estates and conclude their Chapter 11 Cases through a confirmed Chapter 11 plan.
- The Joint Plan of Chrome Holding Co. and its Debtor Affiliates Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and a related Disclosure Statement were filed on August 15, 2025.
- Holders of Allowed Other Secured Claims and Allowed Other Priority Claims are unimpaired and presumed to accept the plan, receiving 100% recovery.
- Holders of U.S. Data Breach Class Settlement Claims, U.S. Data Breach Arbitration Settlement Group Claims, Canadian Data Breach Class Settlement Claims, Chrome Commercial Claims, and Chrome Other General Unsecured Claims are impaired but projected to receive 100% recovery.
- Holders of Lemonaid Commercial Claims and Lemonaid Other General Unsecured Claims are impaired, with projected recoveries to be determined (TBD).
- Holders of HoldCo Interests (equity) are impaired, with projected recoveries to be determined (TBD).
- The plan establishes a Plan Administration Trust, funded by asset sale proceeds, cash on hand, retained causes of action, and cyber insurance proceeds, to facilitate distributions.
- Approximately 170,800 timely proofs of claim and an additional 46,530 late-filed claims have been asserted against the Debtors, with an aggregate asserted amount exceeding $7 trillion.
- The U.S. Data Breach Class Settlement Agreement provides a minimum allowed amount of $30 million and a cap of $50 million for U.S. Data Breach Class Settlement Claims.
- The Canadian Data Breach Class Settlement Agreement caps the aggregate cash distribution for Canadian Data Breach Class Settlement Claims at $3.99 million.
- Chrome Holding Co.'s Class A common stock was delisted from NASDAQ on March 31, 2025, and now trades on the over-the-counter market.
Sentiment
Score: 2
Explanation: The company is undergoing Chapter 11 liquidation, having sold most of its assets and planning to sell its remaining business. This indicates severe financial distress and business failure. While asset sales and settlements are in progress, the overall situation is highly negative for existing equity holders and reflects a significant downturn.
Positives
- Successfully completed the sale of substantially all assets for $302.5 million, providing significant cash for creditor distributions.
- Repaid in full all outstanding debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing, which had a commitment of up to $60 million.
- Reached settlement agreements for major data breach class actions in the U.S. and Canada, which cap potential liabilities related to the Cyber Security Incident.
- The proposed plan aims to maximize value for all stakeholders and facilitate an efficient wind-down and distribution process, avoiding a potentially more costly Chapter 7 liquidation.
- The plan is structured with the intent to pay all creditors in full, and potentially provide distributions to equity holders, although the latter is uncertain.
Negatives
- The company has not recognized any net profits since its inception, indicating a history of unprofitability.
- Experienced severe liquidity pressures due to macroeconomic headwinds, rising inflation, declining consumer interest in genetic testing, and increased competition.
- Suffered a significant data breach in October 2023, impacting approximately seven million customers, leading to numerous class action lawsuits, arbitration claims, and regulatory investigations.
- The company's stock was delisted from NASDAQ due to the Chapter 11 filing, and now trades on the less liquid over-the-counter market.
- The aggregate asserted amount of all claims against the Debtors exceeds $7 trillion, far surpassing the proceeds from asset sales, creating significant uncertainty for recoveries.
- Ongoing appeals of the asset sale order by the State of California and Global BioData Trust (CAVEAT) introduce continued legal uncertainty.
- The Lemonaid telehealth business sale for $2.5 million is subject to higher offers and regulatory approvals, with no assurance of closing.
- The company faces ongoing liquidity restraints and expects to incur significant professional fees during the Chapter 11 process.
- The company's U.S. federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards and other tax attributes will not survive the implementation of the plan.
Risks
- Uncertainty regarding the amount of time the Debtors may spend in bankruptcy.
- High costs of bankruptcy cases and related fees.
- Bankruptcy Court rulings in the Chapter 11 Cases may not be favorable.
- Risk of conversion to a Chapter 7 liquidation case.
- Risk of dismissal of one or more Chapter 11 Cases.
- Uncertainty whether the Lemonaid Sale Transaction will be consummated.
- Risk that results or developments contemplated by the plan may not materialize as anticipated.
- Risk that the Debtors may seek to amend, waive, modify, or withdraw the Plan.
- Risk that other parties in interest may propose an alternative chapter 11 plan.
- Risk that the amount of administrative claims are greater than expected.
- Risk that the actual amount of Allowed Claims and Allowed Interests are materially greater than expected.
- Impact of inflation on operations.
- Impact of unanticipated market and economic conditions.
- Risks that certain estimates and assumptions might ultimately prove to be incorrect.
- Risks of being party to certain legal proceedings and associated expenses.
- Uncertainty of the Governmental Bar Date outcome and potential material claims.
- Risks that the timing of distributions differ from expectations.
- Changes in interest rates.
- Risks associated with bankruptcy, insolvency, and/or other creditor protection proceedings in foreign jurisdictions.
- Immaturity and volatility of the telehealth market.
- Ability to attract new customers and patients for Lemonaid.
- Success of customer engagements and alignment with cost expectations.
- Maintenance and enhancement of the company's brand.
- Impact of fierce competition in the telehealth industry.
- Risks associated with governmental regulation and ability to prescribe certain medications.
- Compliance with extensive regulations.
- Reliance on third parties for compounded medications and FDA/state requirements.
- Risks associated with key sole suppliers.
- Reliance on other companies for platform operation and revenue generation.
- Liquidity requirements and adequacy of capital resources.
- Changes in policies of domestic and foreign government and regulatory authorities.
- Possible adverse impacts of regulatory, legislative, tax, or other judicial developments.
- Force majeure events and continuing economic impact related to COVID-19.
- Risk that releases, injunctions, and exculpations provisions may not be approved.
- Risk of non-occurrence of the Effective Date.
- Risk of failing to satisfy vote requirement for plan confirmation.
- Risk that the plan is based upon assumptions that may prove incorrect.
- Contingencies may affect distributions to holders of allowed claims or interests.
- The Debtors may be adversely affected by potential litigation, including appeals.
- The Debtors cannot guarantee the preservation of their tax attributes (NOLs).
- Settlement agreements may not be approved and/or are subject to termination.
Future Outlook
The plan's primary objective is to maximize value for all stakeholders and distribute available property in accordance with Bankruptcy Code priorities, aiming to avoid lengthy delays and significant costs associated with Chapter 7 liquidation. The Debtors intend for the Plan Administration Trust to be a liquidating trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Debtors believe that the plan will produce a recovery for the Holders of Claims and Interests that is not less than what would be achieved in a Chapter 7 liquidation, and that following consummation, the Debtors will have sufficient funds to make all required payments without further financial restructuring.
Management Comments
- The Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Chrome Holding Co. and the boards of directors, managers, or members, as applicable, of each of its Debtor subsidiaries have approved the transactions contemplated by the Plan and recommend that all Holders of Claims and Interests, Eligible Class Members, and Class Counsel whose votes are being solicited submit ballots and vote to accept the Plan.
- The Debtors believe that Confirmation of the Plan will avoid the lengthy delay and significant cost of liquidation under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
- The Debtors believe that the Plan accomplishes this objective and is in the best interest of the Estates.
- The Debtors believe the Plan, and the transactions, settlements, and compromises embodied therein, are the best alternative available to the estates.
- The Debtors believe that the Plan will produce a recovery for the Holders of Claims and Interests that is not less than what would be achieved in a Chapter 7 liquidation.
- The Debtors believe that, following consummation of the Plan, the Debtors will have sufficient funds to make all payments required by the Plan without the need for any further financial restructuring.
- In the opinion of the Debtors, any alternative other than confirmation of the Plan could result in extensive delays and increased administrative expenses, ultimately resulting in smaller distributions to the Holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed Interests than those set forth in the Plan.
Industry Context
The company, a pioneer in direct-to-consumer genetic testing and telehealth, faced significant industry challenges. These included macroeconomic headwinds, rising inflation, and a general decline in consumer interest and demand for genetic testing. The telehealth market, where the company's Lemonaid business operates, is described as relatively new, unproven, and highly competitive, with increasing competition from traditional healthcare providers expanding into telehealth and new direct-to-consumer entrants. Regulatory scrutiny, particularly concerning genetic data transfer and the prescription of controlled substances, also impacts the industry, requiring careful compliance and potentially affecting business operations.
Comparison to Industry Standards
- The company pioneered direct access to genetic information as the only company with multiple FDA clearances for genetic health reports, setting a high standard in the genetic testing industry.
- The company developed one of the world's largest crowdsourced platforms for genetic research, comprised of data from over 15 million customers, indicating a significant scale in genetic data collection.
- The company's consumer segment faced increased competition in both the ancestry testing and telehealth industries, suggesting a struggle to maintain market share against rivals.
- Many current and potential competitors in the telehealth industry may have greater name and brand recognition, longer operating histories, and significantly greater resources than Lemonaid, potentially offering similar products and services at more attractive prices, indicating a challenging competitive landscape for the company's telehealth segment.
Management Changes
| Role | Previous Person | New Person | Effective Date | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Directors | Multiple (unnamed) | Resigned | September 17, 2024 | Divergence in views from Ms. Wojcicki and belief that no actionable proposal would be received. |
| Independent Directors | NA | Mark Jensen, Andre Fernandez, Jim Frankola | October 28, 2024 | Board increased its size and appointed new independent directors. |
| Independent Director, Special Committee Member | NA | Thomas Walper | March 21, 2025 (effective upon Chapter 11 filing) | Board expanded its size and appointed an additional independent director to the Special Committee. |
| Officer | Anne Wojcicki | Resigned | March 23, 2025, 5:00 p.m. ET | Mutual agreement between Ms. Wojcicki and the Special Committee prior to Chapter 11 filing. |
| Chair of the Board | Anne Wojcicki | Stepped down | March 21, 2025 | Mutual agreement between Ms. Wojcicki and the Special Committee prior to Chapter 11 filing. |
| Director and/or Officer (various subsidiaries) | Anne Wojcicki | Resigned | March 21, 2025 | Mutual agreement between Ms. Wojcicki and the Special Committee prior to Chapter 11 filing. |
| Chairman of the Board | NA | Mark Jensen | March 21, 2025 | Board resolution. |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President | NA | Joseph Selsavage | March 23, 2025, 5:00 p.m. ET | Board resolution, effective upon Ms. Wojcicki's resignation. |
| Chief Restructuring Officer | NA | Matthew Kvarda | March 23, 2025 (effective upon Chapter 11 filing) | Board resolution. |
| Plan Administrator | NA | To be disclosed in Plan Supplement | Effective Date of Plan | Appointment under the Plan to wind down Debtors' affairs. |
| GUC Representative | NA | To be disclosed in Plan Supplement | Effective Date of Plan | Appointment under the Plan to represent Class A Plan Administration Trust Beneficiaries. |
| Equity Representative | NA | To be disclosed in Plan Supplement | Effective Date of Plan | Appointment under the Plan to represent Class B Plan Administration Trust Beneficiaries. |
Corporate Governance
| Change Type | Description | Effective Date | Impact Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board Structure | The Board of Directors increased from one member to four, then to five, with new independent directors appointed to the Special Committee. | October 28, 2024, and March 21, 2025 | Aimed to enhance independent oversight and address potential conflicts of interest, particularly regarding strategic alternatives and the former CEO's proposals. |
| Special Committee Authority | The Special Committee's delegation of authority was expanded to include all matters related to a potential restructuring of the company, including the authority to direct the company to file for Chapter 11 proceedings. | March 7, 2025 | Centralized decision-making for restructuring efforts under independent directors, crucial for navigating the bankruptcy process. |
| Independent Investigation | The Special Committee authorized an independent investigation into the company's governance, financial transactions, and business operations to assess the potential viability of legal claims that may be brought against insiders. | March 16, 2025 | Aimed to identify and preserve potential causes of action for the estate, ensuring a full and fair auction process and maximizing value for stakeholders. |
| Board Dissolution | The existing boards of directors or managers of the Chrome Debtors will be dissolved as of the Effective Date, with the Plan Administrator acting as the sole officer, director, and manager. | Effective Date of Plan | This is a standard step in a Chapter 11 liquidation plan, centralizing control under the Plan Administrator for an orderly wind-down and dissolution. |
Legal Proceedings
- Over 40 putative class action lawsuits were filed in U.S. federal courts (Cyber Class Action MDL No. 3098) related to the October 2023 data breach.
- Approximately 35,000 arbitration claims were asserted or threatened in the U.S. related to the data breach.
- Nine actions were filed in California state courts related to the data breach, which were stayed until May 22, 2025.
- Three class actions were filed in Canadian courts related to the data breach.
- A pre-arbitration demand was made by a U.K. firm on behalf of 3,720 customers.
- The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) served a civil investigative demand (CID) seeking information related to the data breach.
- A Multi-State Attorneys General investigation was initiated regarding the data breach.
- 12 foreign regulators inquired about the data breach, including a joint investigation initiated by Canada and the U.K.
- The United Kingdom Information Commissioners Office imposed a penalty of £2,310,000 (approximately $3 million U.S. dollars) related to the Cyber Security Incident.
- The Spanish Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €2,400,000 (approximately $2.8 million U.S. dollars) related to the Cyber Security Incident.
- The South Dakota Attorney General served a civil investigative demand.
- Shareholder demand letters relating to prepetition conduct were received.
- Adversary proceedings were initiated by certain states in the Bankruptcy Court seeking a determination that consumers have property interests in their genetic data.
- Global BioData Trust (CAVEAT) filed a motion to file an Amici Curiae Brief, arguing for recognition of the company's genetic database as quasi-property held in trust.
- Appeals of the Sale Order by the State of California and CAVEAT to the District Court and Eighth Circuit were filed, with requests for stays denied, but appeals remain pending.
- Settlement agreements were reached for the U.S. Data Breach Class Settlement, U.S. Data Breach Arbitration Settlement, and Canadian Data Breach Class Settlement.
Related Party Transactions
- Ms. Anne Wojcicki, co-founder, former chief executive officer, and current member of the Board of Directors, expressed her intent to consider making an offer to acquire the outstanding equity of the Company held by unaffiliated public stockholders.
- Ms. Wojcicki and New Mountain Capital L.L.C. submitted a joint non-binding indication of interest on February 20, 2025, to acquire all outstanding common stock not owned by Ms. Wojcicki or her affiliates for $2.53 per share (post-reverse stock split). New Mountain later withdrew from this proposal.
- Ms. Wojcicki submitted subsequent non-binding proposals on March 2, 2025 ($0.41/share), and March 6, 2025 ($0.41/share upfront plus contingent value rights), which were rejected by the Special Committee.
- Ms. Wojcicki offered to provide $30 million of unsecured financing for the company's operations through the closing of a potential transaction, and later proposed an additional $20 million of capital, but these offers were part of rejected proposals.
- An entity affiliated with Ms. Wojcicki, ABeeC 2.0 LLC, converted 4,931,692 shares of Class B Common Stock into Class A Common Stock on June 9, 2025.
Stakeholder Impact
- Shareholders (HoldCo Interests): Will receive a portion of Class B Plan Administration Trust Interests. Projected recoveries are 'TBD', implying a high likelihood of minimal or no recovery, and trading in common stock is explicitly stated as highly speculative.
- Creditors (Various Classes): Most allowed claims (Other Secured, Other Priority, U.S. Data Breach Class Settlement, U.S. Data Breach Arbitration Settlement Group, Canadian Data Breach Class Settlement, Chrome Commercial, Chrome Other General Unsecured, Lemonaid Commercial) are projected to receive 100% recovery, primarily through the Plan Administration Trust. However, the actual amount of allowed claims is uncertain and could materially differ.
- Employees: The company implemented a significant headcount reduction (approximately 40% in November 2024). The plan provides for payment of prepetition wages and continuation of employee benefits programs.
- Customers: Customers impacted by the data breach are subject to settlement agreements that provide for distributions and privacy/monitoring services. Customers of the Lemonaid telehealth business will be affected by its sale.
- Suppliers/Vendors: Critical vendors' prepetition claims were authorized for payment. Other trade creditors (Chrome Commercial Claims, Lemonaid Commercial Claims) are projected to receive 100% recovery.
- Regulatory Authorities: The company faces ongoing investigations and has incurred significant penalties from regulatory bodies (e.g., UK ICO, Spanish DPA), indicating a negative impact from regulatory scrutiny.
Next Steps
- The Confirmation Hearing for the Plan is proposed to be held on November 13, 2025.
- The Voting Deadline for accepting or rejecting the Plan is October 31, 2025 (4:00 p.m. CT).
- California and CAVEAT must file their brief on appeal in the District Court by October 6, 2025, and their reply by October 20, 2025.
- The Debtors will seek preliminary and final approval of the U.S. and Canadian Data Breach Class Settlements.
- The Debtors will file a motion to assume the U.S. Data Breach Arbitration Settlement Agreement.
- A Plan Administrator will be appointed to wind down the Debtors' affairs, pay and reconcile claims, and administer the Plan.
- The Plan Administrator will file a certificate of dissolution for the Chrome Debtors and complete all final federal, state, and local tax returns.
- The Plan Administrator will be responsible for filing final monthly and all subsequent quarterly reports.
- The Plan Administrator will collect all applicable proceeds of Insurance Policies, including Cyber Insurance Policies, and create appropriate reserves.
- The Plan Administrator shall promptly file all documents required to close the Chapter 11 Cases after full administration.
Key Dates
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| May 1, 2023 | Start of the 2023 Cyber Security Incident Time Frame. |
| October 1, 2023 | End of the 2023 Cyber Security Incident Time Frame; Company identified and disclosed the data breach. |
| October 20, 2023 | J.R. v. 23andMe Holding Co. et al., BCSC court file no. S-237147, Vancouver Registry, filed. |
| December 21, 2023 | Company filed motion to transfer actions to the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings (Cyber Class Action MDL). |
| January 2024 | Mediation sessions for the Multi-District Litigation (MDL) parties began. |
| March 2024 | Board formed a Special Committee to assess strategic alternatives for the Company. |
| April 2024 | Ms. Wojcicki publicly announced she was considering making a proposal to acquire the Company in a potential go-private transaction. |
| June 2024 | Mediation sessions for the MDL parties continued. |
| July 29, 2024 | Ms. Wojcicki submitted a non-binding indication of interest to acquire outstanding common stock for $0.40 per share (pre-reverse stock split). |
| August 2, 2024 | The Special Committee rejected Ms. Wojcicki's July 29 Proposal. |
| August 2024 | Wells Fargo, at the direction of the Special Committee, contacted 15 potential counterparties to assess third-party interest. |
| September 17, 2024 | Then-serving independent directors of the Board resigned. |
| September 18, 2024 | J.R. and M.M. v. 23andMe Holding Co. et al., BCSC court file no. S-246520, Vancouver Registry, filed. |
| September 2024 | Ms. Wojcicki updated her Schedule 13D, indicating commitment to acquisition but not third-party proposals. |
| October 16, 2024 | Company completed a 1-for-20 reverse stock split. |
| October 28, 2024 | The Board increased its size from one member to four and appointed three new independent directors. |
| October 29, 2024 | The MDL Court held a hearing to consider preliminary approval of the Class Action Settlement Agreement. |
| November 2, 2024 | The Special Committee was repopulated with three new independent and disinterested directors. |
| November 2024 | Company announced discontinuation of therapeutics programs and a headcount reduction of approximately 200 employees (40% of workforce). |
| December 4, 2024 | The MDL Court granted preliminary conditional approval of the Class Action Settlement Agreement. |
| December 2024 | Company engaged in settlement discussions with Cyber Class Action plaintiffs, U.S. state court, and arbitral claimants. |
| January 2025 | Company implemented further cost-cutting measures and authorized Chapter 11 contingency planning. |
| January 28, 2025 | The Special Committee issued a press release announcing exploration of strategic alternatives. |
| January 30, 2025 | Moelis distributed confidential information memorandum and preliminary financial model to Contact Parties. |
| February 13, 2025 | Company entered into a binding term sheet with Settling Arbitration Claimants. |
| February 18, 2025 | Company entered into a binding term sheet with Settling State Court Plaintiffs. |
| February 20, 2025 | Initial IOI Deadline for potential counterparties to submit non-binding indications of interest. |
| March 2, 2025 | Ms. Wojcicki delivered a non-binding proposal to acquire shares for $0.41 per share (post-reverse stock split). |
| March 3, 2025 | Ms. Wojcicki filed an amendment to her Schedule 13D; the Special Committee rejected the March 2 Proposal. |
| March 6, 2025 | Ms. Wojcicki delivered a revised non-binding proposal for upfront cash and contingent value rights. |
| March 7, 2025 | The Board authorized resolutions expanding the Special Committee's delegation of authority to include all matters related to a potential restructuring. |
| March 10, 2025 | Ms. Wojcicki submitted an updated non-binding proposal, including a commitment for $20 million of additional capital. |
| March 16, 2025 | The Special Committee authorized an independent investigation into potential legal claims against company insiders. |
| March 21, 2025 | The Special Committee approved the Chapter 11 filing; Ms. Wojcicki resigned as an officer and stepped down as Board Chair; Mr. Thomas Walper was appointed as an additional independent director and to the Special Committee. |
| March 23, 2025 | Petition Date: Chrome Holding Co. and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. |
| March 24, 2025 | The Debtors filed a motion seeking Bankruptcy Court approval of bidding procedures; NASDAQ notified the Company of its delisting. |
| March 26, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court authorized the Debtors' entry into and performance under the binding term sheet for the DIP Facility. |
| March 28, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the Bidding Procedures Motion and an interim order approving the Debtors' utilities motion. |
| March 31, 2025 | The Company's securities were delisted from NASDAQ. |
| April 3, 2025 | The U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. |
| April 23, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court entered final orders approving the Debtors' cash management and utilities motions, and authorized the Debtors to obtain financing under the DIP Facility. |
| April 28, 2025 | The Debtors entered into the DIP Credit Agreement and filed their Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statements of Financial Affairs. |
| April 29, 2025 | A joint stipulation and agreed order was entered directing the U.S. Trustee to appoint a Consumer Privacy Ombudsman (CPO). |
| April 30, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court established July 14, 2025, as the general bar date for filing proofs of claim and the bar date for Cyber Security Incident claims. |
| May 2, 2025 | The Debtors attended the meeting of their creditors pursuant to section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code. |
| May 6, 2025 | The U.S. Trustee appointed Neil M. Richards as the CPO; the Debtors and DIP Lender executed an amendment to the DIP Credit Agreement. |
| May 14, 2025 | The Debtors commenced an auction for the sale of their assets. |
| May 16, 2025 | The auction for the sale of the Debtors' assets concluded. |
| May 17, 2025 | The Debtors and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. entered into an asset purchase agreement. |
| May 19, 2025 | The Debtors filed the Notice of Successful and Backup Bidders with Respect to the Auction of the Debtors Assets. |
| June 5, 2025 | The United Kingdom Information Commissioners Office imposed a penalty of £2,310,000 (approximately $3 million U.S. dollars) on the Debtors relating to the Cyber Security Incident. |
| June 6, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court approved the proposed framework and procedures for a final round of bidding. |
| June 9, 2025 | Certain states initiated adversary proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court seeking a determination that consumers have property interests in their genetic data. |
| June 11, 2025 | The Consumer Privacy Ombudsman (CPO) filed his report. |
| June 13, 2025 | The Debtors conducted the Final Bidding Round; TTAM Research Institute was selected as the winning bidder with a bid of $305 million; the Debtors executed a revised asset purchase agreement with TTAM (Chrome Purchase Agreement). |
| June 14, 2025 | The Debtors filed the Notice of (I) Adjournment of Sale Hearing and (II) Election of NewCo Drop Down and NewCo Equity Transfer Pursuant to TTAM Asset Purchase Agreement. |
| June 18, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court held the first day of the Sale Hearing; Global BioData Trust (CAVEAT) filed a motion to file Amici Curiae Brief. |
| June 20, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court held the second day of the Sale Hearing. |
| June 27, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court overruled objections, approved the Chrome Sale Transaction, and entered the Sale Order. |
| July 3, 2025 | The State of California and CAVEAT appealed the Bankruptcy Court's Sale Order to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and requested a stay. |
| July 7, 2025 | The Bankruptcy Court denied California's and CAVEAT's motions for a stay pending appeal; California and CAVEAT sought a stay at the District Court, which granted an administrative stay. |
| July 10, 2025 | The District Court held a hearing and issued an order denying the stay requests, allowing the administrative stay to remain until July 11, 2025, 11:59 p.m. CT. |
| July 10, 2025 | California and CAVEAT appealed the District Court's order denying the stay to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. |
| July 11, 2025 | The Court of Appeals denied the renewed stay requests. |
| July 14, 2025 | The Debtors and TTAM consummated the Chrome Sale Transaction; the Debtors repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement. |
| July 15, 2025 | The U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee of Equity Holders. |
| July 21, 2025 | The Debtors received a letter from the Spanish Data Protection Authority imposing a fine of €2,400,000 (approximately $2.8 million U.S. dollars) relating to the Cyber Security Incident. |
| July 25, 2025 | Chrome Holding Co. had approximately 25,431,244 shares of Class A common stock and 2,110,250 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. |
| August 4, 2025 | The Debtors executed the U.S. Data Breach Class Settlement Agreement. |
| August 6, 2025 | An additional 46,530 claims were filed after the General Claims Bar Date. |
| August 11, 2025 | California submitted a stipulated dismissal of their appeals of the District Court's order denying the stays to the Court of Appeals. |
| August 12, 2025 | The Debtors executed the Canadian Data Breach Class Settlement Agreement. |
| August 15, 2025 | Date of Report (earliest event reported); The Debtors filed the Joint Plan of Chrome Holding Co. and its Debtor Affiliates Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and a related Disclosure Statement. |
| August 18, 2025 | Date of signing of the Form 8-K report by Joseph Selsavage, Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer. |
| September 1, 2025 | Voting Record Date for determining which holders of claims and interests and eligible class members and class counsel may vote on the Plan. |
| September 19, 2025 | Governmental Bar Date: Deadline for filing governmental claims. |
| October 6, 2025 | Deadline for California and CAVEAT to file their brief on appeal in the District Court. |
| October 20, 2025 | Deadline for California and CAVEAT to file their reply. |
| October 31, 2025 | Voting Deadline: Deadline for votes to accept or reject the Plan (4:00 p.m. prevailing Central Time). |
| November 13, 2025 | Proposed Confirmation Hearing date for the Plan. |
Recommendation
sellThe company is undergoing Chapter 11 liquidation, having sold most of its core assets and planning to sell its remaining business. Existing equity (HoldCo Interests) is at the bottom of the waterfall recovery, with 'TBD' projected recoveries, implying a high likelihood of minimal or no recovery. The stock has been delisted from NASDAQ and trades on the OTC market, with the company explicitly stating that trading is 'highly speculative and poses substantial risks' and that trading prices 'may bear little or no relationship to the actual recovery, if any.' This is a clear signal of severe impairment and impending loss for equity holders, warranting a 'sell' recommendation.
Keywords
Chapter 11, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, Asset Sale, Data Breach, Telehealth, Genetic Testing, SEC Filing, Corporate Restructuring, Claims Settlement, Creditor Recovery, TTAM Research Institute, Lemonaid Health, Chrome Holding Co., 23andMe
Disclaimer:The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, recommendation, or endorsement of any kind. It may contain errors or omissions. You should not rely on this information to make financial decisions. Always seek the advice of a qualified financial professional before making any investment or financial decisions. Use of this information is at your own risk.